We have discussed the negative impact of authoritarian sales leadership in previous posts because of its negative impact on performance. Democratic or egalitarian leaders lead elite, high-performing sales teams.
According to WBI – The Workplace Bullying Institute’s 2014 national survey, the number of workers affected by workplace bullying is estimated to be over 65 million. “Bosses” do most of the bullying – 55%, followed by co-workers, 33%, who in many cases exhibit abusive behavior because they see the behavior, when left unchecked, as a trait the organization endorses.
Sales teams suffer more than others under authoritarian leadership. If used for a sustained period, this leadership style has been found to create a destructive culture, especially in situations defined by close contact and interrelated goal attainment, such as the sales manager-salesperson relationship.
Let’s be clear: we are talking about dysfunctional organizational behavior. Bennett J Tepper describes this condition in his research, Consequences of Abusive Supervision, as” subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which supervisors engage in the sustained display of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors, excluding physical contact.” In his definition, Tepper points out that sustained indicates that the manager’s actions are not rare but are likely to continue until victims terminate relationships or their abuser change conduct.
The behaviors that subordinates believe to be abusive have been described as follows:
Examples include:
The impact of abusive, authoritarian leaders is double-edged – for both the sales leader and the salesperson. The research is detailed. Both suffer from low job satisfaction and organizational commitment, resulting in lower performance. More troubling is the abusive leadership’s impact on your best sales team members. These are salespeople who derive “meaning” from their work. Meaning is the strongest predictor of workplace outcomes. Additionally, when salespeople experience abuse from their leaders, they may question their worth and ability, leading to a decline in self-esteem and self-confidence. This can further impact their job performance, as they may struggle to communicate effectively with customers, meet sales targets, and take on new challenges.
Here are a few steps you can take to eliminate abusive leadership in your organization:
A study by Bennett Tepper, The Ohio State University’s Fisher College of Business, found that employees with hostile bosses were better off on several measures if they returned the hostility. Tepper said, “..the message from these findings shouldn’t be that employees should automatically retaliate against a horrible boss. The real answer is to get rid of hostile bosses.”