At Compelity, we continually advise our clients to evaluate and adjust their positions in their respective markets. The world has changed—remain relevant or cease to exist is at the core of our guidance.
A body of work on strategy supports our premise that continual refinement and change define strategy in the changed world.
As Rita Gunther McGrath exclaims in her June 2013 HBR article, “Transient Advantage, “strategy is stuck.” She points to a body of work focused on strategy by the thought leaders on the subject, like Ian MacMillan, Kathleen Eisenhardt, Yves Doz, George Stalk, Mikko Kosonen, Richard D’Aveni, Paul Nunes, and others and concludes that “the dominant idea in the field of strategy—that success consists of establishing a unique competitive position, sustained for long periods of time—is no longer relevant for most businesses. They need to embrace the notion of transient advantage instead, learning to launch new strategic initiatives again and again, and creating a portfolio of advantages that can be built quickly and abandoned just as rapidly. Success will require a new set of operational capabilities.”
She breaks down the stages of the lighter, more responsive transient advantage, identifying four distinct phases involved:
The article continues by highlighting seven misconceptions when it comes to adopting the transient advantage strategy methodology, which includes:
The playbook for strategic thinking has changed (Ms McGrath goes into some detail on the subject). Only those forward-thinking organizations will recognize this change and will adapt. Those stuck in the old economy will drop out of the competitive landscape.
This is a required reading for all Compelity clients, and I recommend that you read and heed the advice given. If you want to learn more, here is the Harvard Business Review article.